{"id":80,"date":"2008-11-01T03:16:06","date_gmt":"2008-11-01T11:16:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.tranzoa.net\/~alex\/blog\/?p=80"},"modified":"2008-11-01T03:16:06","modified_gmt":"2008-11-01T11:16:06","slug":"who-owns-public-corporations","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.tranzoa.net\/~alex\/blog\/?p=80","title":{"rendered":"Who owns public corporations?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Who are the owners of a public corporation?<\/p>\n<p>Now, that should be clear: the stockholders, right?<\/p>\n<p>Nope.<\/p>\n<p>Currently, direct stockholders rent companies like we rent cars. That is, the rental can be stopped and started very easily and cheaply.<\/p>\n<p>When you buy a stock, it&#8217;s good to think in terms of your being an owner. Certainly, I like to. But the reality is, you&#8217;re not. You&#8217;re usually using the company as a tool to make a buck, much as I might use a computer or a carpenter might use a hammer.<\/p>\n<p>Too, for the most part, stockholder &#8220;owners&#8221; are 1 step removed from stock ownership. Large (e.g. mutual) funds own public corporations. Individual &#8220;owners&#8221; have shares of funds, diversifying their &#8220;ownership&#8221; in an effort to avoid responsibility for isolated, horrible events in individual companys&#8217; lives. Yes, the fund managers should be awake at the wheel, but the fact is, for them, it&#8217;s Other People&#8217;s Money. And, by design, index funds are <b>completely<\/b> asleep at the wheel.<\/p>\n<p><dir><\/p>\n<p>    The odd thing about this rental situation is that it brings to mind an explanation of why voting was often, historically, restricted to landed, property owners.<\/p>\n<p>    Why?<\/p>\n<p>    Because property owners cannot easily leave their homes. They must bear the brunt of bad votes. Non-property owners can hit the road after messing up a place with their bad votes. The objective of property requirements for voting is to balance power and responsibility. If you&#8217;re not responsible, why should you have power?<\/p>\n<p><\/dir><\/p>\n<p>If stockholders are company renters, then should they even have a vote?<\/p>\n<p>Well, what is &#8220;ownership&#8221;?<\/p>\n<p>Having not been cursed by a too much formal education, I&#8217;ve discovered on my own that a private property economic system works miracles for a commendable reason: responsibility and power are balanced. This balance is A Good Thing. In particular (worth noting in a world that emphasizes the <b>powers<\/b> of ownership), if you know the owner of something, you know who to shoot when the thing does wrong. The &#8220;owner&#8221; is responsible.<\/p>\n<p>I say that the &#8220;owner&#8221; is the person with power and responsibility. And their power and responsibility must be well balanced or their ownership is unstable and will not last.<\/p>\n<p><b>Power and Responsibility in public companies:<\/b><\/p>\n<p>Who has the power in public companies (that is, who calls the shots)?<\/p>\n<p>Ordered by concentration of power in individuals, I&#8217;d say:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>CEO.<\/li>\n<li>Other high level execs.<\/li>\n<li>Board members.<\/li>\n<li>Other employees.<\/li>\n<li>A toss-up between citizens of entities the company pays taxes to and the ultimate, individual stockholders.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>That is to say, the CEO has more power than any individual, high level employee, each of whom has more power than each board member, each of whom &#8230;<\/p>\n<p>The order of this list varies, of course. There are companies with board members voting large percentages of the company&#8217;s stock. The distinction between various employee levels is fuzzy. What decisions are important? Etc.<\/p>\n<p>Who has half the responsibility (that is, who takes the hit when things go wrong)?<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Other employees (markedly so in a company-town situation).<\/li>\n<li>Other high level execs.<\/li>\n<li>CEO.<\/li>\n<li>A toss-up between citizens of entities the company pays taxes to and the ultimate, individual stockholders.<\/li>\n<li>Board members.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Who has the other half of the responsibility (that is, who gets the goodies when things go right)?<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>CEO.<\/li>\n<li>Other high level execs.<\/li>\n<li>A toss-up between citizens of entities the company pays taxes to and the ultimate, individual stockholders.<\/li>\n<li>Other employees (more so in a company-town situation).<\/li>\n<li>Board members.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Note the toss-ups.<\/p>\n<p><dir><\/p>\n<p>One could think of taxable entities as being part owners of companies. After all, if you and your buddy had a store that made $100 every month and your buddy took $70 and you took $30, who owns the store? Looks like a 70\/30 split, right?.<\/p>\n<p>Now consider how much of the store&#8217;s earnings go to the tax man &#8230; which gets interesting when you consider that your partner, the tax man, can raise or lower his cut at any time without your agreement. &#8230; <i>Some partner.<\/i> &#8230; But I digress.<\/p>\n<p>That citizens and stockholders are a ranked together as a toss-up emphasizes the rental aspect of stock holdings.<\/p>\n<p><\/dir><\/p>\n<p><b>Conclusions:<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>The board members are on the high side of the teeter-totter, with low level employees, shareholders, and the taxman looking up from the other side.<\/li>\n<li>The CEO and other high level executives are the company owners.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>It would be nice to put some numbers on these rankings. And calculate the numbers&#8217; changes over time. That is, are these rankings mostly correct, and are they different from, say, 50 years ago?<\/p>\n<p>Maybe these conclusions would be different if I appreciated more the board&#8217;s responsibilities.<\/p>\n<p>But, the conclusions are unexpected. &#8230; By me, anyway.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Who are the owners of a public corporation? Now, that should be clear: the stockholders, right? Nope. Currently, direct stockholders rent companies like we rent cars. That is, the rental can be stopped and started very easily and cheaply. When &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.tranzoa.net\/~alex\/blog\/?p=80\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-80","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloggy-things","category-money"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tranzoa.net\/~alex\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/80","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tranzoa.net\/~alex\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tranzoa.net\/~alex\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tranzoa.net\/~alex\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tranzoa.net\/~alex\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=80"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.tranzoa.net\/~alex\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/80\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":81,"href":"https:\/\/www.tranzoa.net\/~alex\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/80\/revisions\/81"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tranzoa.net\/~alex\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=80"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tranzoa.net\/~alex\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=80"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tranzoa.net\/~alex\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=80"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}